EPISTEMOLOŠKA ŠIBKOST STANDARDNEGA MODELA

Prapok, vesolje, kozmologija, črne luknje...
Odgovori
TimeEinstein
Prispevkov: 643
Pridružen: 26.4.2011 0:00
Kontakt:

EPISTEMOLOŠKA ŠIBKOST STANDARDNEGA MODELA

Odgovor Napisal/-a TimeEinstein »

Epistemological weakness of Standard model and how to make it epistemologically stable and give it the power to unit GR, QM and QED :D

Standard model predicts that all four fundamental forces are carried by different particles. It is considered that space in which particles move does not have any function regarding origin of four fundamental forces of nature. Particle we cannot see with eyes, we can only develop models of them and we can imagine them with our mind. Conscious observer which is free of the mind is aware when we imagine a concrete particle which we search, we always experience its imagine in space. This indicates to the observer that space might play an important role in existence of particles. If we could imagine particle without space this would mean space has a minor importance in life of a particle. It is opposite, we can erase imagine of a given particle we search on but space will remain, our mind imagination has no power to erase space. When we close our eyes space is always there. As human being is a consistent part of the universe we can consider now that fundamentality of space regarding our imagination shows space plays a certain role in life of particles. Particles motion for example is intrinsically related to the space, because particle moves in space.

On the base of importance of space in our human experience it is reasonable to build up preposition that space plays a role in life of particles and in life of four fundamental forces. Considering so gives more “epistemological strength” to the Standard model. Now the question that arises on its own is how are related space and particles from the point of fundamental relation that we study in physics, namely “energy relation”. I was searching for that relation for 5 years and did some terrible errors. When I gave up, a wonderful idea arises: a given particle will diminish energy density of space for amount of the energy he has on its own. Results of this insight which is plausible in a frame of today physics knowledge is that inertial mass and gravitational mass are carried by the diminished energy density of space. Higgs field and gravity field have no their own independent existence apart from the space, their function are carried by the diminished energy density of the space which is caused by the presence of a given particle. With this understanding Standard model become an epistemologically stable model. Strong and weak forces are carried by particles; mass and gravity are carried by diminished energy density of space (which in today physics we call “quantum vacuum”). Electromagnetism is carried by the polarization (excitation) of space as is described by QED. Introduction of an active role of space is giving Standard model unification power to unit GR, QM and QED.

več te tem na www.fopi.info

Uporabniški avatar
shrink
Prispevkov: 14610
Pridružen: 4.9.2004 18:45

Re: EPISTEMOLOŠKA ŠIBKOST STANDARDNEGA MODELA

Odgovor Napisal/-a shrink »

Z drugimi besedami: spet "močno" amritovo šarlatansko "fopanje", ki je - jasno - v korelaciji z njegovo šibko izobrazbo. :lol:

derik
Prispevkov: 2044
Pridružen: 6.3.2010 9:04

Re: EPISTEMOLOŠKA ŠIBKOST STANDARDNEGA MODELA

Odgovor Napisal/-a derik »

TimeEinstein napisal/-a:Conscious observer which is free of the mind is aware when we imagine a concrete particle which we search, we always experience its imagine in space.
. . .
It is opposite, we can erase imagine of a given particle we search on but space will remain, our mind imagination has no power to erase space.
Could you perhaps elaborate on these deep insights, preferably in your native language?

Uporabniški avatar
vojko
Prispevkov: 11767
Pridružen: 29.5.2004 15:18
Kraj: LIMBUŠ
Kontakt:

Re: EPISTEMOLOŠKA ŠIBKOST STANDARDNEGA MODELA

Odgovor Napisal/-a vojko »

derik napisal/-a:
TimeEinstein napisal/-a:Conscious observer which is free of the mind is aware when we imagine a concrete particle which we search, we always experience its imagine in space.
. . .
It is opposite, we can erase imagine of a given particle we search on but space will remain, our mind imagination has no power to erase space.
Could you perhaps elaborate on these deep insights, preferably in your native language?
Nou, hi spiks ingliš sou uel dat hi ken beter ekpres himselv in ingliš... :lol:

derik
Prispevkov: 2044
Pridružen: 6.3.2010 9:04

Re: EPISTEMOLOŠKA ŠIBKOST STANDARDNEGA MODELA

Odgovor Napisal/-a derik »

vojko napisal/-a:
derik napisal/-a:
TimeEinstein napisal/-a:Conscious observer which is free of the mind is aware when we imagine a concrete particle which we search, we always experience its imagine in space.
. . .
It is opposite, we can erase imagine of a given particle we search on but space will remain, our mind imagination has no power to erase space.
Could you perhaps elaborate on these deep insights, preferably in your native language?
Nou, hi spiks ingliš sou uel dat hi ken beter ekpres himselv in ingliš... :lol:
Točno to! Zanaša se na to, do se bo nejasnosti pripisalo slabemu prevodu, ne pa dejanski vsebini. Šlamparija se lepše sliši v jeziku, ki ga ne obvladamo.

Uporabniški avatar
pilot
Prispevkov: 234
Pridružen: 2.7.2009 20:27

Re: EPISTEMOLOŠKA ŠIBKOST STANDARDNEGA MODELA

Odgovor Napisal/-a pilot »

Kako prepoznas da je post od TimeEinstein-a...

http://treasure.diylol.com/uploads/post ... 6ef0d9.jpg

Odgovori