Kvarkadabra forum

Srečko napisal/-a: ↑

25.2.2018 18:56

V cepivih so škodljive snovi in težke kovine. http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.php ki povečajo smrtnost otrok. Na primer v ZDA kjer otroke do enega leta cepijo 26 x, se smrtnost dojenčkov poveča za dva krat v primerjavi z državami, kjer so otroci cepljeni okoli 10 x v prvem letu življenja https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/ a rabite še kaj več strokovnih virov, da vam bo jasno, da moramo v Sloveniji nujno pregledati vsa cepiva na IJŠ ali Kemijskem inštitutu preden gredo v uporabo?!

shrink napisal/-a: ↑

23.2.2018 18:54

Raje se ti "nauč", Sračko, da gre za šarlatanski zmazek psevdoznanstvenikov, ki ga reklamirajo anticepilci, ki ne znajo ločevati resne znanosti od psevdoznanosti:

Before we get to the study itself—which, as you might imagine, has…flaws—let’s take a look at the authors. The first author, Neil Z. Miller, is described as an “independent researcher, and the second author, Gary S. Goldman, is described as an “independent computer scientist.” This is not a promising start, as neither of them appear to have any qualifications that would lead a reader to think that they have any special expertise in epidemiology, vaccines, or science. Still, I suppose one could look at the fact that these two somehow managed to get a paper published in a peer-reviewed journal as being pretty strong evidence for the democratic nature of science, where you don’t necessarily have to be affiliated with a university or a biotech or pharmaceutical company in order to publish in the scientific literature.

Skratka, ta dva sta eksperta za epidemiologijo, kot si ti, Sračko, za fiziko: Zero, Zilch, Nada.

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccin ... -movement/

shrink napisal/-a: ↑

1.3.2018 21:54

Samosračkarsko promocijo?

Srečko napisal/-a: ↑

25.2.2018 18:56

V cepivih so škodljive snovi in težke kovine. http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.php ki povečajo smrtnost otrok. Na primer v ZDA kjer otroke do enega leta cepijo 26 x, se smrtnost dojenčkov poveča za dva krat v primerjavi z državami, kjer so otroci cepljeni okoli 10 x v prvem letu življenja https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/ a rabite še kaj več strokovnih virov, da vam bo jasno, da moramo v Sloveniji nujno pregledati vsa cepiva na IJŠ ali Kemijskem inštitutu preden gredo v uporabo?!

shrink napisal/-a: ↑

23.2.2018 18:54

Raje se ti "nauč", Sračko, da gre za šarlatanski zmazek psevdoznanstvenikov, ki ga reklamirajo anticepilci, ki ne znajo ločevati resne znanosti od psevdoznanosti:

Before we get to the study itself—which, as you might imagine, has…flaws—let’s take a look at the authors. The first author, Neil Z. Miller, is described as an “independent researcher, and the second author, Gary S. Goldman, is described as an “independent computer scientist.” This is not a promising start, as neither of them appear to have any qualifications that would lead a reader to think that they have any special expertise in epidemiology, vaccines, or science. Still, I suppose one could look at the fact that these two somehow managed to get a paper published in a peer-reviewed journal as being pretty strong evidence for the democratic nature of science, where you don’t necessarily have to be affiliated with a university or a biotech or pharmaceutical company in order to publish in the scientific literature.

Skratka, ta dva sta eksperta za epidemiologijo, kot si ti, Sračko, za fiziko: Zero, Zilch, Nada.

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccin ... -movement/