živa in neživa masa

Prapok, vesolje, kozmologija, črne luknje...
Srečko
Prispevkov: 398
Pridružen: 18.1.2018 11:13

živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a Srečko » 24.2.2018 4:59

Znanost danes pojmuje življenje kot komplexni sistem, ki pa v bistvu ni nič drugačen od nežive materije. Na primer kamen in človek v pricipu sta isto. To videnje je zelo povšno. Razvil sem model višjih Hilbertovih prostorov, kjer je sedež, temelj življenja. 3D svet je njegova zadnja manifestacija. Tudi višji Hilbertovi prostori, so določen tip energije in moja ideja je, da ima ta energija tudi določeno maso, ki sem jo izmeril pred mnogimi leti.......
tu sta članka na temo:

http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/arti ... -final.htm

https://www.neuroquantology.com/index.p ... /view/1020

sedaj pa par besed za srinka: geniji ustvarjamo fiziko, ki je povprečneži, kot si ti ne razumejo in nas imajo za nore. za nas genije ste pa vi povrprečneži nuja evolucije. 0,1 % fizikov ustvarja fiziko, 0,9 % jo razume, 99% pa ne razume, teh 99 % ste povprečneži. Do leta 1950 so fiziko ustvarjali geniji. Po tem letu v fiziki ni bilo pravih velikih odkritij. ker so geniji do leta 1950 za-jebal eno stvar, namreč, vrgli so eter iz fizike, napredek v fizki ni več možen. danes ustvarjajo fiziko povprečneži in se tolažijo z nobelovimi nagradami za odkritja stvari, ki jih ni....Higgsovo polje, Gravitacjski valovi.....pa tega srink ti sploh ne boš pošteku. to v resnici pišem za tisti 1% slovenskih fizikov, ki vedo o čem govorim.

Fizika danes rabi generalno revizijo vseh enačb, in tiste, ki ne zadostijo bijektivni funkciji, se pravi, da vsak element v enačbi, ustreza opazovanemu in merjenemu elementu v realnem svetu, morajo biti eliminirane iz fizike. To je to, dragi 1% slovenskih fizikov. Čaka nas veliko zanimivega dela.

PS glede cepiv se mi je pred dnevi dvignil pritisk, ker je to, kar se dogaja s prisilnim cepljenjem v sloveniji, višek norosti, ne-znanosti, podlosti. CEPIVA DANES SO NEVARNA ZDRAVJU NAŠIH OTROK. Ne bom pa o tem več pisal, ker očitno živijo slovenski pediatri v srednjem veku, jaz pa v 21 stoletju. se pa opravičujem, da sem na temo cepiv začel toliko debat, lahko bi vse strnil v eno. imam pač ognjen temperament :wink:

Srečko
Prispevkov: 398
Pridružen: 18.1.2018 11:13

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a Srečko » 24.2.2018 9:32

VPRAŠANJE ZA TISTE KI SE SPOZNATE NA FIZIKO IN RELATIVNOST
Einsteinovo teorijo študiram 40 let. Kar vidim, je, da večina fizikov te teorije še danes ne razume popolnoma.
Pa dajmo to prevert. Dajmo si zamislit, da ste vi v eni vesoljski ladji, ki potuje po vesolju. Vzporedno z vami v nasprotni smeri se giblje druga vesoljska ladja, v kateri je Albert Einstein. Z Einstenom imate radijsko zvezo. Pokliče vas in vam pove, da mu ne dela merilec hitrosti. Isto se je zgodilo tudi vam in mu to poveste. Potem vas Einstein vpraša: Oj, a ti veš, kako bi midva lahko izmerila, katera ladja se giblje hitreje? Če si študiru mojo Relativnost, potem bi to moral vedeti !
Sedaj ste na vrsti vi.....povejte odgovor.

(srink, to da sem jaz kvazi znanstvenik, nor, pseudo-znanstvenik in podobno že vemo. prihrani si debato na to temo. ti ki si steber slovenske fizike, povej odgovor, če pa ne veš, pametno molči ali pa vprašaj Sašota Dolenca, on sigurno ve. :D
Priponke
einstein question.png
einstein question.png (11.29 KiB) Pogledano 1266 krat
Zadnjič spremenil Srečko, dne 24.2.2018 19:30, skupaj popravljeno 1 krat.

Uporabniški avatar
vojko
Prispevkov: 11023
Pridružen: 29.5.2004 15:18
Kraj: LIMBUŠ
Kontakt:

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a vojko » 24.2.2018 19:23

Napisal/-a Srečko
Znanost danes pojmuje življenje kot komplexni sistem, ki pa v bistvu ni nič drugačen od nežive materije. Na primer kamen in človek v pricipu sta isto.
Z 'majhno' razliko: eden je živ, drugi pa ne.
To videnje je zelo povšno.
Hja, bo držalo: zelo 'povšno' ...
Razvil sem model višjih Hilbertovih prostorov, kjer je sedež, temelj življenja.
Resno? Kako, da tega še nismo opazili?
3D svet je njegova zadnja manifestacija. Tudi višji Hilbertovi prostori, so določen tip energije in moja ideja je, da ima ta energija tudi določeno maso, ki sem jo izmeril pred mnogimi leti.......
Koliko kil si jo pa nameril, Srečko? :lol:
sedaj pa par besed za srinka: geniji ustvarjamo fiziko,


Aha, takole gre stopnjevanje pri tebi: raziskovalec, znanstvenik, genij. Je še četrta stopnja?
ki je povprečneži, kot si ti ne razumejo in nas imajo za nore.
To je običajna razlaga pacientov v psihiatričnih ustanovah, zakaj so 'notri' ... :lol:
za nas genije ste pa vi povrprečneži nuja evolucije. 0,1 % fizikov ustvarja fiziko, 0,9 % jo razume, 99% pa ne razume, teh 99 % ste povprečneži.
To, da si genij - si ugotovil sam, ali so ti to povedali tvoji kompanjoni, ki se tudi sami imajo za genije?
Do leta 1950 so fiziko ustvarjali geniji. Po tem letu v fiziki ni bilo pravih velikih odkritij.


Ja, Marija Snežna, si prespal zadnjih 60 let?! No, sicer se pa to vidi iz tvojega poznavanja fizike ...
ker so geniji do leta 1950 za-jebal eno stvar, namreč, vrgli so eter iz fizike, napredek v fizki ni več možen.
Ne bo šlo, Srečko! Stvar sta 'zajebala' Michelson in Morley pred več kot 63 leti od tedaj, ko si prepričan ti. Poskus, s katerim so iz fizike vrgli eter, sta opravila Michelson in Morley že davnega julija 1887... :lol:
danes ustvarjajo fiziko povprečneži in se tolažijo z nobelovimi nagradami za odkritja stvari, ki jih ni...
Kaj češ, Srečko, svet je krivičen in poln nehvaležnežev in ignorantov, ki ne prepoznajo pravih genijev na prvi pogled. Takšni sedijo tudi v komisiji za podelitev Nobelovh nagrad: človek ne more verjeti, da tepci podeljujejo najvišje nagrade v znanosti "za odkritja stvari, ki jih ni..." :lol:

Da bi malo popravili krivico, ki se ti godi, se prijavi za Ig Nobelelovo nagrado (Anti-Nobelova nagrada). Ta komite res nagrajuje prave genije! Lani jo je za fiziko prejel Marc-Antoine Fardin, 'za uporabo dinamike tekočin, s katerim je preveril vprašanje "Ali je lahko mačka obenem trdna ali tekoča?". Leta 2016 so to nagrado za fiziko dobili Gabor Horvath in sodelavci za odkritje, zakaj so 'šimeljni' (white-haired horses) najbolj odporni konji proti obadom in zakaj kačje pastirje usodno privlačijo črni nagrobniki.

Naj ti zaupam, da je glede na tvojo dosedanjo specializacijo v fiziki (tehtanje črvjih duš) zelo pomenljiva odločitev komiteja Ig Nobelelove nagrade, ki je podelila leta 2000 to nagrado Andreju Geimu in Michaelu Berryu za epohalno odkritje magnetne levitacije žive žabe ...
Higgsovo polje, Gravitacjski valovi.....pa tega srink ti sploh ne boš pošteku. to v resnici pišem za tisti 1% slovenskih fizikov, ki vedo o čem govorim.
Daj, naštej nekaj teh od 1% neodkritih slovenskih genijev! (upam, da te ne bo kdo, ki se bo našel na tem tvojem spisku, tožil zaradi žalitve časti in dobrega imena) ...
Fizika danes rabi generalno revizijo vseh enačb, in tiste, ki ne zadostijo bijektivni funkciji, se pravi, da vsak element v enačbi, ustreza opazovanemu in merjenemu elementu v realnem svetu, morajo biti eliminirane iz fizike.
Marija Snežna, saj bodo učbeniki za fiziko takšni, kot so bili za časa Demokrita!
To je to, dragi 1% slovenskih fizikov. Čaka nas veliko zanimivega dela.
Le naprej, v nove zmage!
PS glede cepiv se mi je pred dnevi dvignil pritisk, ker je to, kar se dogaja s prisilnim cepljenjem v sloveniji, višek norosti, ne-znanosti, podlosti. CEPIVA DANES SO NEVARNA ZDRAVJU NAŠIH OTROK. Ne bom pa o tem več pisal, ker očitno živijo slovenski pediatri v srednjem veku, jaz pa v 21 stoletju. se pa opravičujem, da sem na temo cepiv začel toliko debat, lahko bi vse strnil v eno. imam pač ognjen temperament
Ta tvoj 'ognjen temperament' te je že čisto skuril ... :lol:

P.P.S.
Einsteinovo teorijo študiram 40 let.
"/...imam 60 let in skrbim sam za svoje zdravje."
Se pravi od svoje rane mladosti (od 20. leta) samo študiraš fiziko? Neverjetno! Einstein in Newton se lahko skrijeta pred tabo!

Srečko
Prispevkov: 398
Pridružen: 18.1.2018 11:13

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a Srečko » 24.2.2018 19:32

VOJKO nehaj natresat slame
VPRAŠANJE ZAHTEVA ODGOVOR.....

VPRAŠANJE ZA TISTE KI SE SPOZNATE NA FIZIKO IN RELATIVNOST
Einsteinovo teorijo študiram 40 let. Kar vidim, je, da večina fizikov te teorije še danes ne razume popolnoma.
Pa dajmo to prevert. Dajmo si zamislit, da ste vi v eni vesoljski ladji, ki potuje po vesolju. Vzporedno z vami v nasprotni smeri se giblje druga vesoljska ladja, v kateri je Albert Einstein. Z Einstenom imate radijsko zvezo. Pokliče vas in vam pove, da mu ne dela merilec hitrosti. Isto se je zgodilo tudi vam in mu to poveste. Potem vas Einstein vpraša: Oj, a ti veš, kako bi midva lahko izmerila, katera ladja se giblje hitreje? Če si študiru mojo Relativnost, potem bi to moral vedeti !
Sedaj ste na vrsti vi.....povejt odgovor.

Uporabniški avatar
shrink
Prispevkov: 14376
Pridružen: 4.9.2004 18:45

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a shrink » 25.2.2018 1:25

Odgovor (drugič):

Tvoje razumevanje fizike je ŠARLATANSKO. :lol:

Srečko
Prispevkov: 398
Pridružen: 18.1.2018 11:13

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a Srečko » 26.2.2018 20:46

srink ne boš se izvleku......tvoj komentar je namenjen tebi samemu.....kar je res, je, da ne veš odgovora. sam ti nisi iskren, ti se pretvarjaš, da si maher fizke, v bistvu pa pojma nimaš. :D

Uporabniški avatar
shrink
Prispevkov: 14376
Pridružen: 4.9.2004 18:45

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a shrink » 1.3.2018 21:20

Na tem forumu vsakdo količkaj fizikalno pismen pozna odgovor v zvezi s tabo: si pač šarlatan Sračko. :lol:

Srečko
Prispevkov: 398
Pridružen: 18.1.2018 11:13

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a Srečko » 3.3.2018 7:45

srink tvoje pisanje kaže na to da si navadn butl.....cel splet se ti smeji in te pomiluje vključno z mano
pojma nimaš o relatvnosti in sploh o fiziki, ti si naučeni papagaj, ki ne zna mislit s svojo glavo :?

Uporabniški avatar
shrink
Prispevkov: 14376
Pridružen: 4.9.2004 18:45

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a shrink » 8.3.2018 22:51

Hah, Sračko, nikar praznih besed ne razdiraj. LOL

Ker pa vidim, da si se spet napil vodke, ti bom osvežil spomin (komu se cel splet smeje):
Translation : "I'm either too stupid or too lazy to learn any relativity before I start whining about how all of science is wrong and I'm right and now I'd rather someone else put in the effort to explain it to me than I spend one iota of time and effort actually reading and learning from a book".
A meaningless (and oxymoronic) concept.
With herculean emphasis on the 'moronic .
Cranks always believe that, and they're always unable to actually show it. Word salad isn't enough.
Meaningless garbage.
amrit napisal/-a:alex sometime is better to be still.................
than spewing meaningless garbage all over the forum? I agree.
amrit napisal/-a:My work here is done.
Then by all means, leave.
Word salad. It doesn't mean much of anything.
Showing more of your ignorance.
Your evidence for your claim is your claim rewritten into several A4 pages? Obviously the scientific method or even basic logic is beyond you.

To justify your claim you need to do more than just restate your claim. Otherwise you'd have to accept the following :

Proposition : You're an idiot.

Proof : You're an idiot.

In reality though, you're an idiot.
:lol:
Yet things still happened long before you got here, dumbass.
Amrit = run of cholera.
So you keep insisting. Problem is your a clueless nutjob who probably can't tie your own shoes, not to mention dead wrong.
sensation of time is of no value for scienctific research which is why we use non-subjective means to measure it.
What makes you thick, armpit?
armit, I'm sorry, but sometimes we need to take some of our own advice, in your case this advice would be ... wake up.
As is the sensation of the wind blowing through your hair, that doesn't mean the wind does not exist!
Amrit -- the joke is that "What makes us tick" is not about time but the human perception of time and your typo of "What makes us thick" appears as a self-proclamation of abject stupidity, especially to the British idiom. Your repeated errors are symptomatic of someone using cut-and-paste in lieu of the necessary deep understanding which a claim of reading the paper at the professional level would imply.

In your struggles to appear knowledgeable, you merely appear, and this is using your own words here, thick.

No one believes you are capable of reading Nature Reviews Neuroscience when you haven't mastered the citation form which lists when the article was published.
amrit napisal/-a:I work on that subject for 20 years
And Alex Jones worked on Cold Fusion for his entire academic career, he failed. Good thing(for him) that 911 came along so he could sell his scientific cred to the troothers.
amrit napisal/-a:1. sensation of motion happening in linear time is result of neuronal activity of the brain
SENSATION IS NOT THE OBJECT OR FORCE BEING SENSED.
amrit napisal/-a:2. motion runs in timeless space
So you keep insisting, nobody agrees with you.
amrit napisal/-a:3. with clocks we measure duration of motion
4. duration of motion is result of measurement, motion itself has no duration
MEASUREMENT IS NOT THAT BEING MEASURED, nor is that being measure the result of the act of measurement. Time exists and passes whether we are here to measure it or not.

It seems you have wasted the last 20 years of your life, man up and move on.
amrit napisal/-a:I work on that subject for 20 years
What a waste of er.... time. Still, it gave him something to do.
:lol:
amrit napisal/-a:grumpi with you i'll do not discuss the subject as you do not understand it at all
better you do not comment................
Does anyone else see the incredibly funny irony in that statement?

I imagine Amrit never will.
amrit napisal/-a:PS grumpy please keep quite..........
Quite what??? Quite capable of smelling the crap you keep shovelling onto our forum, maybe???
:lol:
amrit napisal/-a:I work on that subject for 20 years, you will see in 5-10 yeas this vision of time will enter main stream, see more on
But in those 20 years you've not been published anywhere reputable, you haven't learnt a single bit of science, you know nothing of mainstream physics, you can't do any of even the basic mathematics of science and yet you believe it'll all magically turn around in the next few years, just like Sylwester does. You (and he) have failed miserably and yet you continue to try to push your nonsense.
armpit napisal/-a:13. Catalin V. Buhusi, Warren H. Meck, What makes us thick?, Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing, Nature reviews, Volume 6, October 2005
Yep, what makes you so "thick", armpit?
amrit napisal/-a:see references
all confirm that time is clocks run in timeless space..........
No, some, perhaps all, put forth that hypothesis. They do not 'confirm' it. And simply quoting Einstein doesn't make you right, he was wrong about a lot of things. And you didn't actually retort my point, that after 20 years you know no science, have nothing reputable published and you're reduced to posting your 'work' on forums, not in journals.
amrit napisal/-a:6. time, means clock run is man invention
Again, grammar is atrocious. I can't even figure out what that means.
Fun Internet Fact of the Day:

On the internet, typing in all-caps is equivalent to yelling, so don't do it.
(hint: people will think you're stupid if you combine all-caps with bad grammar)

If you want to be taken seriously, change your profile signature, etc to reflect conversational grammar. i.e. Read it back to yourself, and see if it makes sense. You can also use a friend to help!
Alice knows! Who ate the mushroom that had the clock in it?

Pardon. Amrit is is dire need of language lessons, much less physics.
amrit napisal/-a:I'm getting boring
No, you've been boring from the very start(not to mention wrong), we've been bored by you for some time now.
amrit napisal/-a:im getting tired explain that again and again
You aren't explaining anything, you just mindlessly repeat the same things again and again. Your 'papers' are just the same, rewording one another and being too short to actually be of any use. You shouldn't be trying to write physics, your 'ideas' are closer to philosophy, as your work has zero impact on how physics is actually done.

Besides, if you are tired of saying it and we are tired of listening to it SHUT UP. Then everyone is happy!
I'm glad to see that you can write coherent English on your "research" paper, but that doesn't hide the vacuous content.
amrit napisal/-a:grumpy all runs slower on the earth than on the moon
your mind too......................
Wait, you're a Mooninite? This explains everything.
I'm glad to see that you can write coherent English on your "research" paper, but that doesn't hide the vacuous content.


He isn't, someone else is doing it for him. He just pays the other idiots and let him put his name on the garbage they write.
amrit napisal/-a:you tell me whAT IS TIME...............IN 5 SENTENCES

I WILL DESTROY YOU IN 1 SENTENCE

NOT WITH INSULTING, BY INTELLIGENCE
Are you some kind of intelligence form of anti-matter? When you come in contact with intelligence you destroy both it and yourself?
:lol:
So everyone in the field of physics is wrong, and you're right.

A classic nutcase.
amrit napisal/-a:so it is.........
Nope, still wrong.
amrit napisal/-a:1. physical events do not run in time but in space only
wrong
amrit napisal/-a:2. we experience physical events run in mind time
wrong.
amrit napisal/-a:3. events have no duration on its own
wrong.
amrit napisal/-a:4. we give them duration by measuring them
wrong.

Does that help?
ter dulcis in fundo:
Amrit Sorli is a crank. Are you Amrit?
Amrit, you one line fuckwit!
Amshit,

Please spare us all the criminally stupid uba-regurgitative codswallop and steep your head in a bucket of fetid herring excrement where it belongs.
:lol:
Amrit Sorli is a crackpot (and so are you, since you ARE Amrit Sorli).
amrit sorli, self-promoting crackpot
It's an unfathomable mystery why Amrit posts on science based sites?

Much like a blind man posing as a photographer, or a quadriplegic attempting to perform a juggling act.

Srečko
Prispevkov: 398
Pridružen: 18.1.2018 11:13

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a Srečko » 11.3.2018 12:25

DAVIDE FISCALETTI’S REVIEW OF AMRIT SORLI’S BOOK
““Physics of truth. Science of peace and prosperity”

In XVI century, a century before Galilei and Newton, Leonardo da Vinci formulated and put in practice the essential features of the scientific methodology: analysis of available literature, systematic observations, experimental tests based on accurate and repeated measurements, and frequent attempts of mathematical generalizations. Like Galileo, Newton and the next generations of scientists, also Leonardo claimed that an intrinsic order existed in nature. However, Leonardo’s science was different from the one of Galilei and Newton. Differently from the mechanistic and reductionist approach of Galilei and Newton, Leonardo’s science was a science of quality, of the organic forms transformed and modelled by underlying processes. According to Leonardo’s approach, nature in its whole was alive and animated, in continuous change and development. Leonardo claimed that in nature a self-organization existed, a mutual link among the different phenomena and that the mechanical features of the human body and of the animals were instruments used by the soul in order to realize the self-organization of the organism [1].
The view of science that Sorli proposes in his beautiful book “Physics of truth. Science of peace and prosperity”, from an epistemological and methodological point of view, can be considered as a natural application and development of Leonardo’s science of quality. Compatibly with the idea of a science of quality, where mathematics has not a primary reality, Amrit Sorli introduces in a brilliant way a new scientific paradigm which can portray a new picture of the universe, and allows a new explanation of physical phenomena, on the basis of the fundamental methodological research method represented by the bijective epistemology (which implies a bijective correspondence between elements of the model and elements of physical reality, namely each element in the physical model of phenomena which we examine corresponds exactly to one element of phenomena themselves), accompanied by the direct experience and the experimental data. The reading of his book opens to the reader the vibrations of insights and findings, of perspectives that appeal.
In line of Leonardo’s view of the mutual connection of all phenomena in an organized whole, Sorli’s book yields very radical breakthrough points in science, by proposing a global view which can unify space, time, matter and consciousness into a more extended scheme. The idea of time as a mathematical parameter which measures only the numerical order of changes in a three-dimensional timeless space, and which originates into an ultimate three-dimensional quantum vacuum, the idea that the phenomenon of duration emerges only as a consequence of a measurement of an observer, the idea that space has concrete physical properties expressed in terms of a variable energy density (and the consequent interpretation of the gravitational waves as ripples of space characterized by gradients of the quantum vacuum energy density) open new keys of reading of the results of special relativity and general relativity, which are in complete agreement with experimental data [2-5].
Moreover, very interesting and dense of fundamental perspectives is Sorli’s view of consciousness as the vibration of the n-dimensional Hilbert space whose limit tends to the infinite value of frequency. A relevant concept introduced by Sorli’s Physics of Truth approach lies in the interpretation of consciousness as the origin of life, which all over the universe has the tendency to develop in intelligent organisms. Compatibly with the view of Leonardo as regards a fundamental similarity in organization and dynamics between macrocosm and microcosm phenomena, Sorli underlines that human beings must be aware that they are only parts of the large universal process in which matter is developing towards consciousness, that in the universe there is a permanent dynamic equilibrium between the different forms of energy and the different natural processes that take place: the universe is a timeless phenomenon which has no origin and has no end and exists in a n-dimensional Hilbert space which is consciousness. In this regard, the following extract from Sorli’s book is very significant: “In Physics Of Truth, the human being and human society are subsystems of the universe. Physics Of Truth is surpassing geo-centrism and is introducing in anthropology, psychology, sociology and economy, the “cosmological approach”, where human society is the subsystem of nature, which is the subsystem of planet Earth, which is the subsystem of the solar system and so on. Today, human society does not respect the fundamental laws of the universe, which results in the enormous problems of today’s human society. We teach our children that they live in a certain place, which has its own history. We teach them our religions; we teach them our cultures. We do not teach them that their real home is the universe. When they become adult their natural connection with consciousness is broken, and they become “civilized”. History teaches us that every civilization that lost its connection with consciousness became lost in the labyrinths of their collective mind. The mind without consciousness is like a blind man seeking for an oasis in the desert.”.
Sorli’s view of consciousness can be considered as a natural development of the science of quality developed by Leonardo da Vinci in XVI century and turns out to be in agreement with the systemic view of life that is currently beginning to emerge in society on the basis of the results of some eminent scientists and thinkers such as Fritjof Capra and Ervin Lazlo [6, 7]. In synthesis, Amrit Sorli’s book “Physics of truth. Science of peace and prosperity” can be considered as a very appealing intellectual attempt to construct a powerful scientific methodology research in line with Leonardo’s philosophy of a science of quality, which thus might lead to develop an ultimate “theory of everything” that, with opportune refinements from the mathematical point of view, could solve important foundational questions of theoretical physics and contribute to the development of a new holistic science in which matter and consciousness are embedded into a unifying picture where they emerge as different aspects of the same fundamental reality.


References
[1] F. Capra, The Science of Leonardo, Doubleday, New York, 2007.
[2] D. Fiscaletti e A. Sorli, The infinite history of now. A timeless background for contemporary physics, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2014.
[3] D. Fiscaletti, The timeless approach. Frontier perspectives in 21st century physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 2015.
[4] D. Fiscaletti and A. Sorli, “Perspectives of the numerical order of material changes in timeless approaches in physics”, Foundations of Physics, Vol. 45, Num. 2, pp. 105–133, 2015.
[5] D. Fiscaletti and A. Sorli, “Dynamic quantum vacuum and relativity”, Annales UMCS Sectio AAA: Physica, Vol. LXXI, pp. 11-52, 2016.
[6] F. Capra e P.L. Luisi, Vita e natura. Una visione sistemica, Aboca Edizioni, Sansepolcro, 2015.
[7] E. Laszlo, Risacralizzare il cosmo, Apogeo/Urra, Milano, 2008.

Uporabniški avatar
vojko
Prispevkov: 11023
Pridružen: 29.5.2004 15:18
Kraj: LIMBUŠ
Kontakt:

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a vojko » 11.3.2018 15:28

Srečko napisal/-a:
11.3.2018 12:25
DAVIDE FISCALETTI’S REVIEW OF AMRIT SORLI’S BOOK
““Physics of truth. Science of peace and prosperity”

In XVI century, a century before Galilei and Newton, Leonardo da Vinci formulated and put in practice the essential features of the scientific methodology: analysis of available literature, systematic observations, experimental tests based on accurate and repeated measurements, and frequent attempts of mathematical generalizations. Like Galileo, Newton and the next generations of scientists, also Leonardo claimed that an intrinsic order existed in nature. However, Leonardo’s science was different from the one of Galilei and Newton. Differently from the mechanistic and reductionist approach of Galilei and Newton, Leonardo’s science was a science of quality, of the organic forms transformed and modelled by underlying processes. According to Leonardo’s approach, nature in its whole was alive and animated, in continuous change and development. Leonardo claimed that in nature a self-organization existed, a mutual link among the different phenomena and that the mechanical features of the human body and of the animals were instruments used by the soul in order to realize the self-organization of the organism [1].
The view of science that Sorli proposes in his beautiful book “Physics of truth. Science of peace and prosperity”, from an epistemological and methodological point of view, can be considered as a natural application and development of Leonardo’s science of quality. Compatibly with the idea of a science of quality, where mathematics has not a primary reality, Amrit Sorli introduces in a brilliant way a new scientific paradigm which can portray a new picture of the universe, and allows a new explanation of physical phenomena, on the basis of the fundamental methodological research method represented by the bijective epistemology (which implies a bijective correspondence between elements of the model and elements of physical reality, namely each element in the physical model of phenomena which we examine corresponds exactly to one element of phenomena themselves), accompanied by the direct experience and the experimental data. The reading of his book opens to the reader the vibrations of insights and findings, of perspectives that appeal.
In line of Leonardo’s view of the mutual connection of all phenomena in an organized whole, Sorli’s book yields very radical breakthrough points in science, by proposing a global view which can unify space, time, matter and consciousness into a more extended scheme. The idea of time as a mathematical parameter which measures only the numerical order of changes in a three-dimensional timeless space, and which originates into an ultimate three-dimensional quantum vacuum, the idea that the phenomenon of duration emerges only as a consequence of a measurement of an observer, the idea that space has concrete physical properties expressed in terms of a variable energy density (and the consequent interpretation of the gravitational waves as ripples of space characterized by gradients of the quantum vacuum energy density) open new keys of reading of the results of special relativity and general relativity, which are in complete agreement with experimental data [2-5].
Moreover, very interesting and dense of fundamental perspectives is Sorli’s view of consciousness as the vibration of the n-dimensional Hilbert space whose limit tends to the infinite value of frequency. A relevant concept introduced by Sorli’s Physics of Truth approach lies in the interpretation of consciousness as the origin of life, which all over the universe has the tendency to develop in intelligent organisms. Compatibly with the view of Leonardo as regards a fundamental similarity in organization and dynamics between macrocosm and microcosm phenomena, Sorli underlines that human beings must be aware that they are only parts of the large universal process in which matter is developing towards consciousness, that in the universe there is a permanent dynamic equilibrium between the different forms of energy and the different natural processes that take place: the universe is a timeless phenomenon which has no origin and has no end and exists in a n-dimensional Hilbert space which is consciousness. In this regard, the following extract from Sorli’s book is very significant: “In Physics Of Truth, the human being and human society are subsystems of the universe. Physics Of Truth is surpassing geo-centrism and is introducing in anthropology, psychology, sociology and economy, the “cosmological approach”, where human society is the subsystem of nature, which is the subsystem of planet Earth, which is the subsystem of the solar system and so on. Today, human society does not respect the fundamental laws of the universe, which results in the enormous problems of today’s human society. We teach our children that they live in a certain place, which has its own history. We teach them our religions; we teach them our cultures. We do not teach them that their real home is the universe. When they become adult their natural connection with consciousness is broken, and they become “civilized”. History teaches us that every civilization that lost its connection with consciousness became lost in the labyrinths of their collective mind. The mind without consciousness is like a blind man seeking for an oasis in the desert.”.
Sorli’s view of consciousness can be considered as a natural development of the science of quality developed by Leonardo da Vinci in XVI century and turns out to be in agreement with the systemic view of life that is currently beginning to emerge in society on the basis of the results of some eminent scientists and thinkers such as Fritjof Capra and Ervin Lazlo [6, 7]. In synthesis, Amrit Sorli’s book “Physics of truth. Science of peace and prosperity” can be considered as a very appealing intellectual attempt to construct a powerful scientific methodology research in line with Leonardo’s philosophy of a science of quality, which thus might lead to develop an ultimate “theory of everything” that, with opportune refinements from the mathematical point of view, could solve important foundational questions of theoretical physics and contribute to the development of a new holistic science in which matter and consciousness are embedded into a unifying picture where they emerge as different aspects of the same fundamental reality.


References
[1] F. Capra, The Science of Leonardo, Doubleday, New York, 2007.
[2] D. Fiscaletti e A. Sorli, The infinite history of now. A timeless background for contemporary physics, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2014.
[3] D. Fiscaletti, The timeless approach. Frontier perspectives in 21st century physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 2015.
[4] D. Fiscaletti and A. Sorli, “Perspectives of the numerical order of material changes in timeless approaches in physics”, Foundations of Physics, Vol. 45, Num. 2, pp. 105–133, 2015.
[5] D. Fiscaletti and A. Sorli, “Dynamic quantum vacuum and relativity”, Annales UMCS Sectio AAA: Physica, Vol. LXXI, pp. 11-52, 2016.
[6] F. Capra e P.L. Luisi, Vita e natura. Una visione sistemica, Aboca Edizioni, Sansepolcro, 2015.
[7] E. Laszlo, Risacralizzare il cosmo, Apogeo/Urra, Milano, 2008.
Fiscaletti je - kot je splošno znano in priznano - pravi 'peer' za tvojo 'beautiful' knjigo. Do zdaj sem mislil, da lahko ta pridevnik uporabimo za žensko ali umetniško delo, ne pa za 'znanstveno' knjigo ... Tvoj amico Fiscaletti nas je naučil, da so subjektivni umetniški kriteriji uporabni tudi v znanosti ... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Roman
Prispevkov: 5972
Pridružen: 21.10.2003 8:03

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a Roman » 11.3.2018 17:27

Popravek: v "znanosti" ...

Uporabniški avatar
vojko
Prispevkov: 11023
Pridružen: 29.5.2004 15:18
Kraj: LIMBUŠ
Kontakt:

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a vojko » 11.3.2018 17:33

Roman napisal/-a:
11.3.2018 17:27
Popravek: v "znanosti" ...
:D

Srečko
Prispevkov: 398
Pridružen: 18.1.2018 11:13

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a Srečko » 11.3.2018 17:43

vojko OPAZOVALEC (SUBJEKT) je temeljni element fizike.....opazovalec si TI, sam ti tega še ne veš :D

Uporabniški avatar
vojko
Prispevkov: 11023
Pridružen: 29.5.2004 15:18
Kraj: LIMBUŠ
Kontakt:

Re: živa in neživa masa

Odgovor Napisal/-a vojko » 11.3.2018 18:02

Srečko napisal/-a:
11.3.2018 17:43
vojko OPAZOVALEC (SUBJEKT) je temeljni element fizike.....opazovalec si TI, sam ti tega še ne veš :D
:shock: :shock: :lol:

Odgovori