By the end of 19th-century ether was thrown out of physics. MM experiment has given the null result and the model of ether which way serving physics for two centuries was demolished. After ether was abandoned the question has arisen, how the photon can move in the universal space without his medium. Einstein has solved the question by a very superficial explanation, namely, that photon can move in an “empty space”.

In order to progress physics, at the beginning of the 20th-century, there was an unsolved puzzle, namely, physicists discover that light has the same speed in all inertial systems for all observers. In 1905 Einstein has published his Special Theory of Relativity where the problem was mathematically solved with the introduction of “length contraction” and “time dilatation. Time has become the 4th dimension of space without having single experimental evidence for such interpretation of time.

With Italian physicist Davide Fiscaletti, we have been developing SR in a 3D Euclidean space, with Galilean transformation and Selleri formula for time, without length contraction and time dilation. Several articles were published in Physics Essays and some other journals. The fact is that in the universe time is not relative; relative is the velocity of material changes, rate of clocks included. In the universe, there is no “internal observer”, no “external observer”, no “proper time”, no “coordinate time”, which all are Einstein’s mathematical tricks in order to describe a constancy of light speed for all observers.

Keeping ether as the physical origin of the universal space the constancy of light is elegantly preserved. The source of light is in the ether (which today we call “super-fluid quantum vacuum”) all observers move in the same ether. Photon is the vibration of the ether and has the same speed for all observers. The speed of light is invariant for all observers and obeys Doppler effect. This description is in accord with all the experimental data we have in physics. It is time we abandon Einstein's mathematical tricks and build physics which is based on the observation and experiment.

Einstein has developed the mathematical trick of length contraction in General Theory of Relativity, where hypothetical gravitational wave should shrink or dilate space-time. We prove with Fiscaletti time has only the mathematical existence, so it cannot shrink or dilate. We publish an article on time as only the mathematical parameter of material change, i.e. motion in Foundations of Physics.

What happened in LIGO is that gravitational waves are changing the variable density of the vacuum. Change of variable density of vacuum is changing its permeability and permittivity which is minimally changing the light speed. In LIGO was measured that light beam when passing the interferometers is changing minimally the speed. The interpretation of these results is wrong. A gravitational wave is not shrinking and dilating space-time, first at all, because space-time does not exist. The vacuum is the origin of universal space and in the vacuum is always NOW.

The NOW was puzzling Einstein his entire life and he did not manage to integrate it into physics. This is now done by the development of Dynamic Vacuum Relativity (DVR) which integrates Relativity, Quantum electrodynamics, and Higgs mechanism.

Če koga zadeva zanima, mu pošljem knjigo v PDF zastonj.

https://www.amazon.com/PHYSICS-PROGRESS ... 1097778118

## Nadgradnja Einsteinovih Matematičnih Trikov

### Re: Nadgradnja Einsteinovih Matematičnih Trikov

Sračko in njegov amico Fiscaletti = Lolek in Bolek fizike, t.j. bulšit fizike.

### Re: Nadgradnja Einsteinovih Matematičnih Trikov

Glej, Srečko, zmeniva se takole: če mi plačaš 50.-EUR, mi lahko pošlješ tvojo knjigo. Lahko je v kateremkoli formatu; tudi na glinenih ploščicah, franko kupec ...Srečko wrote: ↑21.7.2019 11:30By the end of 19th-century ether was thrown out of physics. MM experiment has given the null result and the model of ether which way serving physics for two centuries was demolished. After ether was abandoned the question has arisen, how the photon can move in the universal space without his medium. Einstein has solved the question by a very superficial explanation, namely, that photon can move in an “empty space”.

In order to progress physics, at the beginning of the 20th-century, there was an unsolved puzzle, namely, physicists discover that light has the same speed in all inertial systems for all observers. In 1905 Einstein has published his Special Theory of Relativity where the problem was mathematically solved with the introduction of “length contraction” and “time dilatation. Time has become the 4th dimension of space without having single experimental evidence for such interpretation of time.

With Italian physicist Davide Fiscaletti, we have been developing SR in a 3D Euclidean space, with Galilean transformation and Selleri formula for time, without length contraction and time dilation. Several articles were published in Physics Essays and some other journals. The fact is that in the universe time is not relative; relative is the velocity of material changes, rate of clocks included. In the universe, there is no “internal observer”, no “external observer”, no “proper time”, no “coordinate time”, which all are Einstein’s mathematical tricks in order to describe a constancy of light speed for all observers.

Keeping ether as the physical origin of the universal space the constancy of light is elegantly preserved. The source of light is in the ether (which today we call “super-fluid quantum vacuum”) all observers move in the same ether. Photon is the vibration of the ether and has the same speed for all observers. The speed of light is invariant for all observers and obeys Doppler effect. This description is in accord with all the experimental data we have in physics. It is time we abandon Einstein's mathematical tricks and build physics which is based on the observation and experiment.

Einstein has developed the mathematical trick of length contraction in General Theory of Relativity, where hypothetical gravitational wave should shrink or dilate space-time. We prove with Fiscaletti time has only the mathematical existence, so it cannot shrink or dilate. We publish an article on time as only the mathematical parameter of material change, i.e. motion in Foundations of Physics.

What happened in LIGO is that gravitational waves are changing the variable density of the vacuum. Change of variable density of vacuum is changing its permeability and permittivity which is minimally changing the light speed. In LIGO was measured that light beam when passing the interferometers is changing minimally the speed. The interpretation of these results is wrong. A gravitational wave is not shrinking and dilating space-time, first at all, because space-time does not exist. The vacuum is the origin of universal space and in the vacuum is always NOW.

The NOW was puzzling Einstein his entire life and he did not manage to integrate it into physics. This is now done by the development of Dynamic Vacuum Relativity (DVR) which integrates Relativity, Quantum electrodynamics, and Higgs mechanism.

Če koga zadeva zanima, mu pošljem knjigo v PDF zastonj.

https://www.amazon.com/PHYSICS-PROGRESS ... 1097778118

### Re: Nadgradnja Einsteinovih Matematičnih Trikov

vi se kar norčujte,

na koncu boste izpadli smešno

ker kmalu bo objavljan moj članek v

NATURE,

na koncu boste izpadli smešno

ker kmalu bo objavljan moj članek v

NATURE,

### Re: Nadgradnja Einsteinovih Matematičnih Trikov

Resno?

Se spomniš tvojih napovedi za

*perpetuum mobile*? Naprej si junaško napovedoval datume, ko ga boš izdelal, nato si jih nekaj časa odmikal v bodočnost, nazadnje pa si bil prisiljen priznati urbi et orbi, da iz te moke ne bo kruha. Sprejmem kakršnokoli stavo, da peer-ov v NATURE ne boš uspel naplahtati. NATURE je resna revija z impactom.

Torej?

### Re: Nadgradnja Einsteinovih Matematičnih Trikov

Resno?

Se spomniš tvojih napovedi za

*perpetuum mobile*? Naprej si junaško napovedoval datume, ko ga boš izdelal, nato si jih nekaj časa odmikal v bodočnost, nazadnje pa si bil prisiljen priznati urbi et orbi, da iz te moke ne bo kruha. Sprejmem kakršnokoli stavo, da peer-ov v NATURE ne boš uspel naplahtati. NATURE je resna revija z impactom.

Torej?

### Re: Nadgradnja Einsteinovih Matematičnih Trikov

Ja, v bistvu se je Srečkova napoved uresničila, vendar le v "Scientific Reports" pod okriljem Nature, ki pa je zelo daleč od tiste mainstream revije Nature, tako daleč, da je v teh "raportih" prišel skozi sito celo pavijanov iztrebek z obrazom Donalda Trumpa na njem (seveda je bil "članek" kasneje umaknjen):vojko wrote: ↑30.7.2019 12:45Resno?

Se spomniš tvojih napovedi zaperpetuum mobile? Naprej si junaško napovedoval datume, ko ga boš izdelal, nato si jih nekaj časa odmikal v bodočnost, nazadnje pa si bil prisiljen priznati urbi et orbi, da iz te moke ne bo kruha. Sprejmem kakršnokoli stavo, da peer-ov v NATURE ne boš uspel naplahtati. NATURE je resna revija z impactom.

Torej?

https://retractionwatch.com/2018/12/21/ ... a-journal/

V luči tega me ne preseneča, da je šlo skozi tudi Srečkovo sračkanje.