GJ napisal/-a:To da ne poznamo odgovora še ne pomeni, da naključja obstajajo!vojko napisal/-a:GJ je napisal:
Potem bom ponovno potegnil iz naftalina standardno vprašanje, ki sem ga že večkrat postavil (pa nanj še nisem dobil plavzibilnega odgovora): torej, kaj je vzrok za radioaktivni razpad konkretnega atomskega jedra v določenem trenutku?Moje stališče je, da naključja ne obstajajo!
Če mehanizem ne bi obstajal bi posledično obstajala verjetnost, da v istem trenutku razpadejo vsa nestabilna jedra v vesolju hkrati.
Vzrok je potrebno iskati v močni in šibki jedrski sili in njunem ravnovesju, morda pa so vzrok za razpad nestabilnih jeder ravno vakuumske fluktuacije, ki se v določenem trenutku seštejejo s šibko jedrsko silo to pa povzroči razpad jedra in sprostitev vezalne energije.
Nikoli presežena...vojko napisal/-a:Zdavnaj presežena hipoteza o skritih spremenljivkah.Naključje je zgolj posledica pomanjkanja informacij.
Quantum indeterminacy is the apparent necessary incompleteness in the description of a physical system, that has become one of the characteristics of the standard description of quantum physics. In quantum mechanics, however, indeterminacy is of a much more fundamental nature, having nothing to do with errors or disturbance.
Quantum physics, quantum events do not require causes, have a look at radioactive decay, sub-atomic particles decay without cause, and positron/electron pairs form in vacuums, without cause.(WIKI)
On the question of the 'validity of the law of causality' we have this opinion: as long as one takes into account only experiments that lie in the domain of our currently acquired physical and quantum mechanical experience, the assumption of indeterminism in principle, here taken as fundamental, agrees with experience. (Max Born and Werner Heisenberg)
Da ne boš mislil, da citiram samo out of date vire, je tule najnovejši:
In the present work (August 2011) we have ... excluded the possibility that any extension of quantum theory (not necessarily in the form of local hidden variables) can help predict the outcomes of any measurement on any quantum state. In this sense, we show the following: under the assumption that measurement settings can be chosen freely, quantum theory really is complete".( Roger Colbeck; Renato Renner : "No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power". Nature Communications )
No, kaj praviš? Se vsi motijo?
Je sicer uporabna ta kvantna 
